Privacy Law


MLRC 50-State Survey: Media Privacy and Related Law 2010-11
By: Media Law Resource Center
Price: £123.50 (New)



The Law of Personal Privacy
By: David Sherborne, Mark Thomson, Hugh Tomlinson
Price: £28.50 (New)



Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and The Media (0)
Price: £250.00 (New)


Human Rights and the Protection of Privacy in Tort Law (UT Austin Studies in Foreign and Transnational Law)
By: Hans-Joachim Cremer
Price: £68.08 (New)
£93.57 (Used)



Confidentiality, Personality and Privacy in Scots Law
By: Elspeth Reid
Price: £135.00 (New)


The Law of Privacy and the Media
Price: £38.47 (New)
£40.00 (Used)


Human Rights and Private Law: Privacy as Autonomy (Studies of the Oxford Institute of European & Comparative Law)
By: Katja Ziegler
Price: £35.15 (New)
£55.45 (Used)


New Dimensions in Privacy Law: International and Comparative Perspectives
Price: £50.40 (New)
£77.31 (Used)


The Law of Privacy and the Media: First Cumulative Updating Supplement
Price: £19.93 (New)
£16.50 (Used)


English Privacy Law Cases: Max Mosley V News Group Newspapers Limited, Douglas V Hello! Ltd, Campbell V Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd
By: Books Llc
Price: £7.77 (New)
£12.37 (Used)

Privacy Law

Google Does not Abuse Privacy Laws


The fact that Google readily hands over information to governments about it's users is morally on par with a cop's snitch who specializes in jaywalking. Is it fair that our goes tax dollar helps these Google searches? That is a question for the tax department, not Google.


Many people forget that private corporations are allowed to do pretty much whatever they please once you have used their services. In this case, once you use Google to search anything, legally, they have full right to give or sell that information to any interested party. Including any government in the world. And who can blame them? The citizenry of the United States does live in a free market economy.


A free market is defined by an exchange of goods or services at an arranged price. As stated earlier, it is seriously doubtful that Google hands over information for free. So not only is this legal but it is an example of everything the founding father's of the United States stood for as far as economic policy was concerned.


While the United States has moved from an industrial and manufacturing economy to a service based and information economy. Google is one of the few success stories and, instead of complaining, people should be praising them for their ability to make money which largely is spent on other products. Mostly Asian and Latin American made product, but we have no one to blame but ourselves for that.


What is stopping "Joe the Plumber" from setting up his own business? Taxes? No, if Joe wants to make more money, someone needs to tell him to set up a national or, better yet, internationally used plumbing service. Sort of like Google has managed to do so successfully.


Conversely, if Google is allowing itself to be browbeaten into giving up information on individual's searches, then their legal team should be sent back to a remedial Corporate Law class. That is the only case in which Google could be held liable in a United States court of law.


Governments aside, let's say that any man or woman off the street waltzes into Google's headquarters and shows the receptionist a cashier's check for $10 billion dollars, then requests search results for any I.P. address. Does anyone honestly think that the receptionist would not contact the bosses who would then be rushing downstairs to accommodate this client?


Does google legally abuse the idea behind the privacy laws? It is a popular question. But, to the chagrin of civil liberty lawyers, the answer is inequitable. Google, like all other corporate entity, has the right to sell their legal goods or products. Unfortunately for those who scream that this is illegal, they are selling information. And information, by law, is legal to sell.


The bigger question should be, do governments have the right to purchase this information? While it is beyond reprehensible that a government would stick it's nose into the private lives of it's citizenry, the answer is, yes they do.


If you don't want Big Brother looking over your shoulder, go to the library.


For more information on privacy laws, visit http://www.privacylawmicroblog.com/






Article Source: ArticlesBase.com

Related Privacy Law Videos


Next page: Privacy Law In Uk


Privacy Law News


Introduction to Asset Protection - (Secrets of Asset Protection)


www.lodmell.com Asset Protection attorney Douglass Lodmell explains what is asset protection and how it started. Get the lawsuit protection you ...

youtube.com

Read more...


Negative Equity Real Estate Strategy (Secrets of Asset Protection)


www.lodmell.com The nation's #1 asset protection attorney Douglass Lodmell, JD, LL.M. goes into detail about a specific strategy you can use ...

youtube.com

Read more...


Asset Protection vs. Estate Planning


"Estate planning and asset protection are very comparable but tend to have different goals. Estate planning tends to be planning that takes ...

ehow.com

Read more...


Setting Up An Asset Protection Trust: Part 1 of 2


www.davidjenyns.com Setting up the ideal structure for your trading business can be daunting. Through extensive research, I've discovered that ...

youtube.com

Read more...


YouTube - douglasslodmell's Channel


youtube.com

Read more...


Treasury paying millions in fees for asset protection scheme


The Government has paid bankers lawyers and accountants £26.5m so far for advice in setting up the statebacked insurance scheme for banks.

telegraph.co.uk

Read more...


The Litigation Explosion-Bulletproof Asset Protection

Read more...


Permalink: Privacy Law | Copyright © 2010 www.hideitnow.com All Rights Reserved

  Home   Sitemap   Develop Your Domain Names   This Site is For Sale